After opening the digital door, digital collections have also become the focus of most attention.
These are roughly divided into two factions, one of which is to wait and see. Generally speaking, this kind of people is interested in the prospect of digital development. As an emerging industry, digital products are irreplaceable in the future, and they are encrypted and safe. The guarantee is reliable, and the only thing that is unclear is whether it can be put into the market normally in the future.
The other faction is the conservative group, which can also be said to be dismissive. These people generally feel that this digital product is purely an IQ tax. Anyone can publish, participate or even sell it. There is no standardized market at all.
But from the perspective of the country, after all, this industry is still in its infancy, and a series of related issues in the follow-up need to be continuously integrated and planned, and to prevent and stop the hype and purely commercial behavior of some criminals. Therefore, what the country wants There is still a lot to do, and it is difficult to plan and guide the entire project at a time. As an individual collector, the most important thing for such digital commodities is to see clearly and not to follow blindly.
Then there will definitely be friends who will ask, I want to enter the game, which category should I collect better? Is there any recommendation? This is the crux of the problem, look at the platform and institution, and collect them in a targeted manner.
Although it seems that these digital collections are just a picture, a string of codes, and a set of numbers, the meanings they represent are not the same.
This is like some historical and cultural treasures that we are most concerned about, such as Dunhuang, the Forbidden City, Terracotta Army, etc., can be used as the focus of collectors and targeted collections. After all, the market is just starting now, and many friends like to follow suit, but they don’t know which ones will have development and market prospects in the future. Blindly following blindly will inevitably lead to making ends meet. Therefore, it is more important to see the significance of platforms and collections.
For example, some products jointly authorized by some national museums and the Palace Museum are worth collecting. After all, we still need a long way to see the real thing, and storing these digital collections in our own treasure house can more effectively inherit the essence of this historical culture and nation.
Therefore, what is collected is not the key point, the key point is that the collection itself has cultural connotation.
When it comes to digital collections, we have to talk about the ownership of copyright. From the current point of view, the copyright belongs to the author himself, and the author authorizes the platform and organization to sell and auction, and then grants the individual through the form of secondary copyright change, and the individual does not fully own all the copyright. In other words, it only has the right to collect and donate. As for the copyright issue of secondary sales and sales, it is relatively troublesome. Therefore, whether it is collection of digital collections or gifts in the future, it is also important to figure out the copyright ownership. Content.
In my opinion, whether it is the metaverse, the blockchain, or digital collections, they are all inseparable from the subject of people. Although it is the general trend, it is still unknown what the future will be like. Remember not to follow blindly. It is better to collect the inheritance of this culture and concept. After all, it takes a long historical process and the polishing of the vicissitudes of time to preserve the entity, and the digitization of the object is also convenient for better inheritance.
